Updates related to OA, sent to Twitter during January 2010:
- Moving Towards OA: 6 month embargo, review papers & selected papers OA upon publication, green OA is OK [January 31]: http://bit.ly/9viSfR
- RT @oatp: Why and how RePEc is free [January 28]: http://bit.ly/545NhD http://is.gd/7e9vn
- On article (and journal) level metrics and their inevitable consequences (via http://ff.im/eUpLp) [January 28]
- Management of publication compliance with the NIH Public Access Policy (via http://ff.im/eTp6s) [January 28]
- RT @oatp: Open Access to Scientific Publications … (criticisms of publication fees) [January 28]: http://bit.ly/aSw9K3
- RT @oatp: Using SWORD and SWAP to Implement the MIT OA Mandate [January 27]: http://bit.ly/blXiGG
- Harvard response to White House RFI on public access policies [January 25]: http://bit.ly/8RcZAU
- RT @Academicsnet: Why I am disappointed with Nature Communications – http://bit.ly/65edp8 Neylon on problems with CC-BY-NC [January 25]
- RT @chronicle: Cornell Library Proposes New Model to Keep arXiv Going [January 21]: http://bit.ly/5X2YqN
- RT @thereporat: Scientists: why your access to the literature is about to get worse (+ what to do) [January 21]: http://url4.eu/1B6PF
- SPARC’s submission to the OSTP on OA for publicly-funded research [January 20]: http://bit.ly/7S4sg1 http://bit.ly/6g3OXo
- OASPA’s response to the OSTP’s request for public comment on Public Access Policies [January 20]: http://bit.ly/5F1Rg9
- Publication in a big-name journal is like membership in an exclusive club? [January 14]: http://bit.ly/6KVWH6
- Comment about the response from The Royal Society to the OSTP Public Access Forum [January 12]: http://ff.im/ec5JD
- OSTP Public Access Policy Forum Enters “Bonus” Round [January 12]: http://bit.ly/6j8KK0 (and http://bit.ly/4N6K3E)
- Response from The Royal Society to OSTP Public Access Forum [January 12]: http://bit.ly/4tG7yf (via http://bit.ly/4N6K3E)
- RT @mimasnews: New UKPMC OA (beta) interface available @ http://bit.ly/6pe5Oy (also see PR: http://bit.ly/89o22M) [January 12]
- Fwd: Open and Shut?: Open Access: Counting Gold “Is Gold Open Access growing?” [January 10]: http://bit.ly/92K7iA (via http://ff.im/e1Tn7)
- Fwd: EASE Journal Blog: N – The end of impact factors . . . and journals? [January 10]: http://ff.im/dXgIB
- RT @shwu: Why Hasn’t Scientific Publishing Been Disrupted Already? [January 8]: http://ff.im/-dM6fW
- Discussion of preprint about mandated OA versus self-selective OA [January 8]: http://bit.ly/8SQdsZ
- RT @justgrimes: Open Access Concept Map (by Laura Briggs found via LISNews) — very cool [January 8]: http://bit.ly/7l1jvI
- Preliminary data about CIHR-supported publications cited in PubMed [January 7]: http://ff.im/dYcKP
- The art of evaluating the impact of medical science [January 7]: http://bit.ly/7fFyaW
- RT @PLoS: PLoS ONE to be indexed in Web of Science [January 6]: http://tiny.cc/ONEWoS
Be openly accessible or be obscure 